ABOUT SAFE Authors Policies Publication Process Submit
Publication Standards
Publication Standards

All manuscripts submitted to SAFE Journal of One Health are assessed against seven criteria. A manuscript must satisfy all seven to be considered for publication.

These standards apply to all article types across the natural sciences, medicine, engineering, and the related social sciences and humanities. SJOH does not assess manuscripts on the basis of perceived significance or impact.

Overview

All manuscripts submitted to SJOH are assessed against the following seven criteria. A manuscript must satisfy all seven to be considered for publication.

1The manuscript reports the results of original research.
2The findings reported have not been published elsewhere.
3Experiments, statistical analyses, and other analyses are conducted to a high technical standard and are described in sufficient detail.
4Conclusions are well-founded and properly supported by the data.
5The manuscript is clearly written and presented in standard English.
6The research satisfies all applicable ethical standards for experimentation and research integrity.
7The manuscript conforms to relevant reporting guidelines and community standards for data availability.

1. The manuscript reports the results of original research.

SJOH exists to disseminate original research and research methods. We welcome submissions from the natural sciences, medical research, engineering, and the related social sciences and humanities that advance the base of academic knowledge.

Article Types We Do Not Accept

SJOH does not consider unsolicited submissions of the following article types:
  • Reviews
  • Clinical case reports
  • Hypotheses or proposal papers
  • Letters, commentaries, or essays
  • Opinion pieces
  • Policy papers
  • Clinical practice guidelines
  • Any other type of secondary literature
  • Monographs
Collection Reviews and Collection Overviews may be commissioned on occasion, but these are associated with specific, pre-planned Collections and will not be considered unless solicited.

Article Types We Consider

We will consider the following article types:

Article TypeOur Position
Registered ReportsWe consider pre-registered research including both Registered Report Protocols (defining study rationale and design) and the Registered Report research articles reporting on the outcomes upon study completion.
Systematic reviewsWe consider systematic reviews where the methods ensure comprehensive and unbiased sampling of existing literature. See the submission guidelines for more information.
Methods, software, databases, or toolsWe consider submissions describing methods, software, databases, or other tools if they follow the appropriate reporting guidelines. See the submission guidelines for more information.
Qualitative researchWe consider qualitative research only if it adheres to appropriate study design and reporting guidelines, as described in the submission guidelines.
Studies reporting negative resultsIn keeping with our commitment to publish all valid research, we consider negative and null results.
ProtocolsWe consider two types of protocol articles — Lab Protocols and Study Protocols — provided they comply with our submission guidelines.

2. The findings reported have not been published elsewhere.

Previously Published Work

SJOH does not consider for publication studies that have already appeared, in whole or in part, elsewhere in the peer-reviewed literature. All figures included in manuscripts must be original and must not have been published in any previous publication.

We will also not consider submissions that are currently under consideration for publication at another journal.

SJOH supports authors who wish to share their work early via deposition on preprint servers. This does not affect consideration of the manuscript. We will consider manuscripts that have been deposited on preprint servers such as bioRxiv or arXiv, published as a thesis, or presented at conferences.

Replication Studies

If a submitted study replicates or closely resembles previous work, authors must provide a sound scientific rationale for the submitted work and clearly cite and discuss the relevant existing literature. Submissions that replicate or are derivative of existing work will likely be declined if authors do not supply adequate justification.


3. Experiments, statistical analyses, and other analyses are conducted to a high technical standard and are described in sufficient detail.

Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls and replication. Sample sizes must be sufficient to produce robust results, where applicable. Methods and reagents must be described in enough detail to allow another researcher to reproduce the experiments described.


4. Conclusions are well-founded and properly supported by the data.

The data presented in the manuscript must support the conclusions drawn. Submissions will be declined if the interpretation of results is unjustified or inappropriate, so authors should avoid overstating their conclusions. Authors may discuss possible implications for their results provided these are clearly identified as hypotheses rather than conclusions.


5. The manuscript is clearly written and presented in standard English.

SJOH does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Manuscripts that do not meet these standards may be declined.

If the language of a manuscript is difficult to follow or contains numerous errors, we may recommend that authors seek independent editorial assistance before submitting a revision. Such services can be found online by searching for "scientific editing service" or "manuscript editing service."


6. The research satisfies all applicable ethical standards for experimentation and research integrity.

Ethics of Experimentation

All research published in SJOH must have been conducted to the highest ethical standards. We reserve the right to decline any submission that does not meet these standards, which in some cases are more stringent than local ethical requirements.

Approval from the relevant body is required for studies involving:

Where approval was not obtained, authors must explain why it was not required. Please contact the SJOH editorial office at sjoh@safesociety.org if you have questions about your work and compliance with accepted ethical standards.

Publication Ethics

SJOH is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and abides by its Code of Conduct, aiming to adhere to its Best Practice Guidelines. Authors are expected to comply with best practices in publication ethics, specifically regarding authorship, dual publication, plagiarism, figure manipulation, and competing interests.

For further details about SJOH's expectations for publication ethics, see the Editorial Policies. Any concerns regarding the above should be directed to the editorial office at sjoh@safesociety.org.


7. The manuscript conforms to relevant reporting guidelines and community standards for data availability.

Reporting Guidelines

Results must be rigorously reported, as appropriate, based on community standards. Further information about discipline-specific reporting guidelines can be found in the submission guidelines.

Data Availability

Authors must follow community standards and practices for depositing data in publicly accessible resources, including those created for gene sequences, microarray expression, structural studies, and comparable categories of data. Failure to comply with community standards may result in the manuscript being declined.

For further information about SJOH requirements for data sharing and deposition in public databases, see our data availability policy.